Where court information systems are concerned, real-time trial coverage provides advantages that conventional information clearly can not. Thanks to stenography computerization and sophisticated transcription software which converts the keystrokes of the court reporter into legible text, it is now possible to see what’s being said in real time. Although providing evidence in real-time is an extraordinary advancement that has significantly altered court coverage, it is just one of the advantages to real-time court reporting.Do you want to learn more? Visit Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters of West Palm Beach
In addition , the rapid computerization of the spoken word enables lawyers to mark up the evidence automatically and illustrate places for later retrieval. For example, the software translates the output of the machine into text, as the court reporter transcribes the oral testimony into the steno machine. Not only is that text capable of appearing in court room on TV monitors, it appears on computers that are hooked up to the system. Furthermore, the text can be broadcast over the Internet, thus allowing remote delivery. If the prosecutor is in the same space as the court writer or is accessible remotely, the prosecutor will locate problems, show testimonials in real time, and also easily check the document for earlier conversations.
Anyone who has worked with keyword searches in long documents will appreciate the ability to search for specific keyword phrases quickly for live testimonials. For example, in regular documentation, the attorney may rely on recollection or observations to go back to certain earlier conversations after a subject has been addressed or a query asked. A quick keyword search brings up the exact words uttered with real-time reporting, thus allowing the attorney to quickly find specific discussions for further exploration.
Another benefit of reporting in real-time is that lawyers work in teams. For example, a remote attorney may be able to ask questions during the deposition, as the information streams as it is revealed to the remote computer. With standard court reporting, litigators who are not present during the testimony must wait for the transcripts before considering their input. There is no delay with remote real-time court reporting and it is less likely that there will need to be a second deposition scheduled.
Reporting in real-time courts also goes beyond the current testimony. Through this system all transcripts from a whole case can be collected and called up easily. An entire case database can be searched, and the case can be summarized neatly. Within the created software and links, documents , images, and other case-related files may also be organized. For example, if a witness talks about an accident scene, you can link to photographs of the accident scene.
Best of all, court reporting in real-time is efficient, leading to lower overall costs. Since the testimony is keyed into the steno machine, translated by the software, and delivered in real time to your computer, fewer manpower is required. The court writer has to manually interpret the jargon of the computer for normal court coverage, and then copy the file. A one-hour deposition would take more than twice that amount of translation and transcription time.
Gain all of the real-time news opportunities and likely pay less for the service when using a real-time trial monitoring program.